06/09/2025 / By Ramon Tomey
A Brazilian comedian has been sentenced to jail over jokes he delivered during a stand-up comedy performance in 2022.
The Third Federal Criminal Court of Sao Paulo handed down the sentence on comedian Leo Lins Tuesday, June 3. His sentence of more than eight years behind bars arose from jokes he made during a 2022 stand-up performance titled “Pertubador” (“Disturbing”), which the tribunal deemed discriminatory.
Prosecutors argued that Lins’ jokes incited hatred against marginalized groups including Black Brazilians, indigenous communities, LGBTQ+ individuals and people with disabilities. The performance uploaded to YouTube amassed over three million views before being forcibly removed in 2023 under a separate order. (Related: Comedian Rob Schneider booted off Canadian stage for making COVID, gender jokes.)
The tribunal’s decision hinged on Brazil’s anti-discrimination laws, which prosecutors invoked to argue that Lins’ routine constituted “verbal violence” and fostered social division. It also emphasized that freedom of expression is not absolute and must yield when it allegedly conflicts with societal values. According to the court, footage of Lins’ performance served as an aggravating factor in the sentencing.
Alongside the prison term, Lins was fined 300,000 Brazilian reais ($53,640) for “collective moral damages.” The comedian’s legal team condemned the draconian ruling, announcing plans to appeal the sentence.
Lins’ lawyer compared the punishment to penalties for violent crimes. “Watching a comedian receive the same punishment as someone convicted of drug trafficking, corruption or even murder, all because of jokes told on stage, is deeply troubling,” the lawyer stated.
The case sparked a fierce debate over free speech, state censorship and the criminalization of humor. It also underscores a growing global trend where governments increasingly penalize speech under the banner of protecting “human dignity”, a precedent critics warn could erode democratic freedoms.
Fellow comedians and free speech advocates rallied behind Lins, warning of the chilling effect on artistic expression. Antonio Tabet, creator of the satirical group Porta dos Fundos, called the verdict “madness” on X.
You might not find Leo Lins’ jokes funny – you might even detest them – but sentencing someone to prison over them is madness and harmful,” Tabet wrote. “I hope this irrational decision is overturned.”
Meanwhile, comedian Jonathan Nemer lamented Brazil’s inversion of priorities. He expressed dismay over his country taking “comedians’ jokes seriously but treats politicians’ actions as a joke.”
Historically, Brazil’s legal system has grappled with balancing free speech and protections against hate speech. This case, however, marks one of the harshest penalties ever imposed for comedic content. Critics argue that such rulings mirror authoritarian tactics seen in regimes that weaponize vague laws to silence dissent.
The precedent echoes past crackdowns on satire – from the persecution of dissident artists under military dictatorships to modern-day “hate speech” prosecutions in Western democracies. Whether Lins serves his sentence or sees it overturned, his prosecution has already exposed the fragility of free expression in an era where speech itself is increasingly policed as a crime.
Watch comedian Tom Cotter firing back at political correctness in his interview on Newsmax below.
This video is from the NewsClips channel on Brighteon.com.
Comedian Hasan Minhaj admits that he invents stories about being a target of racism.
Sources include:
Tagged Under:
biased, big government, Brazil, Censorship, First Amendment, freedom, government, intolerance, jail time, Leo Lins, Liberty, outrage, political correctness, Sao Paulo, speech police, Third Federal Criminal Court, thought police
This article may contain statements that reflect the opinion of the author
COPYRIGHT © 2017 FIRSTAMENDMENT.NEWS
All content posted on this site is protected under Free Speech. FirstAmendment.news is not responsible for content written by contributing authors. The information on this site is provided for educational and entertainment purposes only. It is not intended as a substitute for professional advice of any kind. FirstAmendment.news assumes no responsibility for the use or misuse of this material. All trademarks, registered trademarks and service marks mentioned on this site are the property of their respective owners.